Saturday, January 14, 2012

Gitksan against Kitksan

Christ the Movie Producer

Post modern alternatives to Western Merchant Culture require unification in action that is based on enjoying the immediate benefits produced within the community that accomplishes unity, as defined by their culture. Religion identifies the nature of the relationship and the connections binding the population on earth to their spiritual legacy above in Heaven, as we say. Culture asserts the many and various ways of understanding and believing that are open to free and autonomous individuals. Since life is a function of boundaries it is natural that we organize the world according to affinities while resisting immature and undeveloped notions of the right order of things. Europe gives us the law court in which to work out the issues of priority.

The body of English Common Law rests on applying Biblical concepts to existing relationships, producing the situation in which Delgamuukw decided in the courts that the claim of ownership of the Chiefs had not been fully argued or claimed, so the claim should be formalized by negotiations or by a further trial of the main question.

What is the main question?


Now that GTS is defunct, the main claim is to be manifested in fact or in court before a Judge. The "chiefs' Cliques" have two alternatives to explore and must select either a full blown democracy, one vote per Indian, or a Monarchy with one Chief over all. GTS proves the fallacy of the Neil Sterritt Model, that the land was governed by his set of chiefs.

There could only have been 3 Chiefs, one over each Tribe, and the Totems tell their own story. Haaxw's and Gitemguldo's in Kitanmaax.

The two sticks are the Cross and the Totem.

Chief Kitsilano, Wilps Haaxw Laax Sal, from Hazelton to Vancouver,
Chief of the Province of BC.
See RCan. v. Sterritt v. RBC
Prov Ct 122223 Smithers Registry